Logo image
Back
I-PASS Adherence and Implications for Future Handoff Training
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

I-PASS Adherence and Implications for Future Handoff Training

Helen K. Hughes, Janet R. Serwint, Jennifer K. O'Toole, Nancy D. Spector and Thuy L. Ngo
Journal of graduate medical education, v 11(3)
01 Jun 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-18-01086.1
PMID: 31210861
url
https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-18-01086.1View
Published, Version of Record (VoR) Open

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background A formal handoff process, such as the I-PASS handoff program, can improve communication about patients among residents. Faculty observation of resident handoffs has served as the primary method for documenting adherence to I-PASS, and little is known about residents' use when they are not being observed. Objective We determined how frequently pediatric residents use I-PASS when not being observed. Methods We implemented I-PASS in the 2016–2017 academic year and anonymously surveyed residents (December 2016 and June 2017), asking them how they perceive the effectiveness of I-PASS at enhancing patient safety, their frequency of I-PASS use when not observed, co-residents' frequency of use, and open-ended questions regarding factors affecting use. Results Fifty-one (52%) and 50 (51%) of 99 eligible residents completed the December and June surveys, respectively. All respondents thought I-PASS had some effectiveness in enhancing patient safety. In December, only 6 (12%) residents stated they used I-PASS more than 75% of the time and reported providing a synthesis statement during handoffs more than 75% of the time. The results were similar for both surveys. Commonly cited reasons for not using I-PASS included time (n = 30), prior knowledge of patients (n = 20), and patients with limited complexity (n = 9). Conclusions While most residents thought I-PASS was effective at enhancing patient safety, many reported that they do not use all 5 elements in most of their handoffs when not being observed. Barriers reported included time, familiarity with patients, and limited patient complexity.

Metrics

5 Record Views
9 citations in Scopus

Details

Logo image