Published, Version of Record (VoR)Open Access via Drexel Libraries Read and Publish Program 2025CC BY V4.0, Open
Abstract
Collaborative and social computing Computing occupations Computing profession Empirical studies in collaborative and social computing Empirical studies in interaction design Human-centered computing Interaction design Interaction design process and methods Professional topics Social and professional topics User centered design
Human-centered design, a theoretical ideal, is sometimes compromised in industry practice. Technology firms juggle competing priorities, such as adopting new technologies and generating shareholder returns, which may conflict with human-centered design values. This study sought to identify the types of workplace situations that present barriers for human-centered design, going beyond the views and behaviors of individual professionals. Q methodology was used to analyze the experiences of 14 UX professionals based in the United States. Five factors were identified, representing workplace situations in which human-centered design is inhibited, despite the involvement of UX professionals: Single-Minded Arrogance, Competing Visions, Moving Fast and Breaking Things, Pragmatically Getting By, and Sidestepping Responsibility. Underpinning these five factors are the dimensions of speed and clarity of vision. This paper demonstrates connections between the literature on UX ethics and human-centered design practice, and its findings point toward opportunities for education and intervention to better enable human-centered and ethical design in practice.
Metrics
3 Record Views
Details
Title
Identifying the Barriers to Human-Centered Design in the Workplace: Perspectives from UX Professionals
Creators
Tim Gorichanaz (Corresponding Author) - Drexel University
Publication Details
Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction, v 9(2), pp 1-25
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
Number of pages
25
Resource Type
Journal article
Language
English
Academic Unit
Information Science
Web of Science ID
WOS:001549326000002
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-105004413744
Other Identifier
991022051452304721
InCites Highlights
Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool: