Logo image
Imputation of Incident Events in Longitudinal Cohort Studies
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Imputation of Incident Events in Longitudinal Cohort Studies

George Howard, Leslie A. McClure, Claudia S. Moy, Monika M. Safford, Mary Cushman, Suzanne E. Judd, Brett M. Kissela, Dawn O. Kleindorfer, Virginia J. Howard, David J. Rhodes, …
American journal of epidemiology, v 174(6), pp 718-726
15 Sep 2011
PMID: 21804050
url
https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwr155View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)Open Access (License Unspecified) Open

Abstract

Life Sciences & Biomedicine Public, Environmental & Occupational Health Science & Technology
Longitudinal cohort studies normally identify and adjudicate incident events detected during follow-up by retrieving medical records. There are several reasons why the adjudication process may not be successfully completed for a suspected event including the inability to retrieve medical records from hospitals and an insufficient time between the suspected event and data analysis. These "incomplete adjudications" are normally assumed not to be events, an approach which may be associated with loss of precision and introduction of bias. In this article, the authors evaluate the use of multiple imputation methods designed to include incomplete adjudications in analysis. Using data from the REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) Study, 2008-2009, they demonstrate that this approach may increase precision and reduce bias in estimates of the relations between risk factors and incident events.

Metrics

11 Record Views
21 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
Logo image