Logo image
In Young Infertile Women Low Serum Anti-Müllerian Hormone is Not a Good Predictor of Ongoing Clinical Pregnancy Rate [36A]
Journal article   Peer reviewed

In Young Infertile Women Low Serum Anti-Müllerian Hormone is Not a Good Predictor of Ongoing Clinical Pregnancy Rate [36A]

Selena Park, Deanna Brasile, William Dampier and Karen Berkowitz
Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953), v 133 Suppl 1(1), pp 19S-19S
May 2019

Abstract

INTRODUCTION:Age and serum anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) levels strongly influence treatment decisions in infertile women. We compared ongoing clinical pregnancy rates (PR) in younger (<35) versus older (> or =35) infertile women with AMH levels of <1.0 or > or =1.0 undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). METHODS:Included142 infertile women aged 30-45 at a private practice from 2014-2018. Patients were stratified by age and serum AMH. Recordedserum estradiol, follicle-stimulating hormone, AMH, age, race, BMI, number of COH cycles, medication quantities. Excludedwomen with ovulatory dysfunction, PCOS, ovarian surgery, smoking, autoimmune disease, FSH levels of >40. Ongoing clinical pregnancylive intrauterine gestation of > or =8 weeks by pelvic ultrasound. RESULTS:Ongoing clinical PR was different in women with AMH <1.0 when stratified by age (P<.05). Nine younger women undergoing 5 or more COH cycles attained an ongoing clinical pregnancy, while in older women, ongoing clinical PR was 50% (95% CI 36-63, N 16). In contrast, women with AMH > or =1.0 showed no difference in ongoing clinical PR when stratified by age, with PR of 69% in younger (95% CI 62-74, N 37) and 64% in older women (95% CI 58-70, N 25) after 4 COH cycles. CONCLUSION:We demonstrated as a proof of principle that age is a better predictor of ongoing PR than serum AMH when values are <1.0. This suggests that age is a more clinically useful parameter than AMH when counseling younger infertile women undergoing COH stimulation about their probability of ongoing clinical PR.

Metrics

10 Record Views

Details

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Web of Science research areas
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Logo image