Logo image
Initial diagnostic impressions of trainees during autism evaluations: High specificity but low sensitivity
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Initial diagnostic impressions of trainees during autism evaluations: High specificity but low sensitivity

Ashley de Marchena, Andrea Trubanova Wieckowski, Yasemin Algur, Lashae N Williams, Sherira Fernandes, Rebecca P Thomas, Leslie A McClure, Sarah Dufek, Deborah Fein, Aubyn C Stahmer, …
Autism research
21 Apr 2023
PMID: 37084079
url
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6pr0c0dtView
url
https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.2933View
Published, Version of Record (VoR) Open

Abstract

diagnostic confidence toddlers diagnosis early detection initial impression Autism
Reducing the age of first autism diagnosis facilitates access to critical early intervention services. A current "waitlist crisis" for autism diagnostic evaluation thus demands that we consider novel use of available clinical resources. Previous work has found that expert autism clinicians can identify autism in young children with high specificity after only a brief observation; rapid identification by non-experts remains untested. In the current study, 252 children ages 12-53 months presented for a comprehensive autism diagnostic evaluation. We found that junior clinicians in training to become autism specialists (n = 29) accurately determined whether or not a young child would be diagnosed with autism in the first five minutes of the clinic visit in 75% of cases. Specificity of brief observations was high (0.92), suggesting that brief observations may be an effective tool for triaging young children toward autism-specific interventions. In contrast, the lower negative predictive value (0.71) of brief observations, suggest that they should not be used to rule out autism. When trainees expressed more confidence in their initial impression, their impression was more likely to match the final diagnosis. These findings add to a body of literature showing that clinical observations of suspected autism should be taken seriously, but lack of clinician concern should not be used to rule out autism or overrule other indicators of likely autism, such as parent concern or a positive screening result.

Metrics

25 Record Views
5 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Behavioral Sciences
Psychology, Developmental
Logo image