How accurate are insights compared to analytical solutions? In four experiments, we investigated how participants' solving strategies influenced their solution accuracies across different types of problems, including one that was linguistic, one that was visual and two that were mixed visual-linguistic. In each experiment, participants' self-judged insight solutions were, on average, more accurate than their analytic ones. We hypothesised that insight solutions have superior accuracy because they emerge into consciousness in an all-or-nothing fashion when the unconscious solving process is complete, whereas analytic solutions can be guesses based on conscious, prematurely terminated, processing. This hypothesis is supported by the finding that participants' analytic solutions included relatively more incorrect responses (i.e., errors of commission) than timeouts (i.e., errors of omission) compared to their insight responses.
Insight solutions are correct more often than analytic solutions
Creators
Carola Salvi - Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago
Emanuela Bricolo - University of Milano-Bicocca
John Kounios - Drexel University
Edward Bowden - University of Wisconsin–Parkside
Mark Beeman - Northwestern University
Publication Details
Thinking & reasoning, v 22(4), pp 443-460
Publisher
Routledge
Grant note
T32 NS047987 / National Institutes of Health (10.13039/100000002)
1144976 / National Science Foundation (10.13039/100000001)
24467 / John Templeton Foundation (10.13039/100000925)
Resource Type
Journal article
Language
English
Academic Unit
Psychological and Brain Sciences (Psychology)
Web of Science ID
WOS:000393303700003
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-84958545333
Other Identifier
991019169709004721
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
InCites Highlights
Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool: