Logo image
Insight solutions are correct more often than analytic solutions
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Insight solutions are correct more often than analytic solutions

Carola Salvi, Emanuela Bricolo, John Kounios, Edward Bowden and Mark Beeman
Thinking & reasoning, v 22(4), pp 443-460
01 Oct 2016
PMID: 27667960
url
https://europepmc.org/articles/pmc5035115View
Accepted (AM)Open Access (License Unspecified) Open

Abstract

Creativity insight problem solving
How accurate are insights compared to analytical solutions? In four experiments, we investigated how participants' solving strategies influenced their solution accuracies across different types of problems, including one that was linguistic, one that was visual and two that were mixed visual-linguistic. In each experiment, participants' self-judged insight solutions were, on average, more accurate than their analytic ones. We hypothesised that insight solutions have superior accuracy because they emerge into consciousness in an all-or-nothing fashion when the unconscious solving process is complete, whereas analytic solutions can be guesses based on conscious, prematurely terminated, processing. This hypothesis is supported by the finding that participants' analytic solutions included relatively more incorrect responses (i.e., errors of commission) than timeouts (i.e., errors of omission) compared to their insight responses.

Metrics

15 Record Views
159 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#4 Quality Education

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Psychology, Experimental
Logo image