Logo image
Intraoperative computerised tomography scan for percutaneous fixation of the pelvis: a retrospective case series
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Intraoperative computerised tomography scan for percutaneous fixation of the pelvis: a retrospective case series

Daniel T Altman, Kevin T. Monahan, Hogan William, Matthew Chilton, Michael Maher, Alice Hughes, Gregory T Altman and Jon Erik Hammarstedt
International orthopaedics, v 48, pp 2743-2748
15 Aug 2024
Featured in Collection :   Research Supported by Drexel Libraries' OA Programs
url
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-024-06265-7View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)Open Access via Drexel Libraries Read and Publish Program 2024CC BY V4.0 Open

Abstract

Pelvis CT scan Intra-operative O-arm Fluoroscopy Revision Medical Imaging
Purpose Fractures and dislocations of the pelvic ring are complex injuries that when treating require meticulous attention to detail and often specialized technical skill. These injuries can be the result of high-energy trauma, particularly in younger patients, or low energy trauma more often found in the elderly. Regardless of mechanism, these injuries lie on a spectrum of severity and can be treated conservatively or surgically. Percutaneous fixation under fluoroscopic guidance is the preferred standard technique when treating these fractures. This technique can be challenging for a variety of reasons including patient characteristics, intra-operative image quality, fracture morphology, among others. Methods This retrospective study evaluated the use of intra-operative computed tomography (CT) using an O-arm imaging system for critical evaluation of fluoroscopic-guided screw placement in twenty-three patients. We retrospectively reviewed all cases of patients who were treated by three fellowship-trained orthopaedic traumatologists during a one-year span. Patients undergoing percutaneous pelvis fixation using both standard fluoroscopy and intraoperative CT with the Medtronic O-arm® (Minneapolis, MN) imaging system. Additionally, procedures performed included open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of the pelvic ring, acetabulum, and associated extremity fractures. Results Twenty-three patients were included in this study. On average, the use of intraoperative CT added 24.4 min in operative time. Five patients (21.7%) required implant adjustment after O-arm spin. Fourteen patients underwent additional post-operative CT. No secondary revision surgeries were attempted after any post-operative CT. Conclusions Our study suggests that intra-operative CT scan, compared to post-operative CT scan, can be utilized to prevent take-back surgery for misplaced implants and allow for adjustment in real-time.

Metrics

20 Record Views
2 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Web of Science research areas
Orthopedics
Logo image