Logo image
Lack of group-to-individual generalizabilityis a threat to human subjects research
Journal article   Open access

Lack of group-to-individual generalizabilityis a threat to human subjects research

Aaron J. Fisher, John D. Medaglia and Bertus F. Jeronimus
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, v 115(27), pp E6106-E6115
03 Jul 2018
PMID: 29915059
url
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1711978115View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)Open Access (License Unspecified) Open

Abstract

Multidisciplinary Sciences Science & Technology Science & Technology - Other Topics ESI Highly Cited Paper (Incites)
Only for ergodic processes will inferences based on group-level data generalize to individual experience or behavior. Because human social and psychological processes typically have an individually variable and time-varying nature, they are unlikely to be ergodic. In this paper, six studies with a repeated-measure design were used for symmetric comparisons of interindividual and intraindividual variation. Our results delineate the potential scope and impact of nonergodic data in human subjects research. Analyses across six samples (with 87-94 participants and an equal number of assessments per participant) showed some degree of agreement in central tendency estimates (mean) between groups and individuals across constructs and data collection paradigms. However, the variance around the expected value was two to four times larger within individuals than within groups. This suggests that literatures in social and medical sciences may overestimate the accuracy of aggregated statistical estimates. This observation could have serious consequences for how we understand the consistency between group and individual correlations, and the generalizability of conclusions between domains. Researchers should explicitly test for equivalence of processes at the individual and group level across the social and medical sciences.

Metrics

15 Record Views
745 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#4 Quality Education

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Highly Cited Paper 
Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Psychology, Clinical
Logo image