Logo image
Long-term impact of Russell 2000 Index rebalancing
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Long-term impact of Russell 2000 Index rebalancing

Jie Cai and Todd Houge
Financial analysts journal, v 64(4), pp 76-91
01 Jul 2008

Abstract

Business & Economics Business, Finance Social Sciences
The study reported here examined the long-term impact of Russell 2000 Index rebalancing on portfolio evaluation, A buy-and-hold index portfolio outperformed the annually rebalanced index in the 1979-2004 period by an average of 2.22 percent over one year and 17.29 percent over five years. Although short-term momentum and the poor long-term returns of new issues partially explain these returns, index deletions were found to provide significantly higher factor-adjusted returns than index additions. Some small-capitalization fund managers appear to capture a portion of these benefits. The strongest performing funds enhanced their factor-adjusted returns by an average of 1.45 percent per year by holding index deletions and/or avoiding index additions. Among the weakest performing funds, higher returns from holding index deletions were offset by the poor returns of new issues added to the index. Thus, index methodology may provide a structural incentive for portfolio managers to drift from their benchmarks.

Metrics

9 Record Views
24 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#8 Decent Work and Economic Growth

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Business, Finance
Logo image