Logo image
Malignant mesothelioma: Ongoing controversies about its etiology in females
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Malignant mesothelioma: Ongoing controversies about its etiology in females

Xaver Baur, Arthur L. Frank, Colin L. Soskolne, L. Christine Oliver and Corrado Magnani
American journal of industrial medicine, v 64(7), pp 543-550
Jul 2021
PMID: 34036634

Abstract

asbestos etiology exposure history mesothelioma women
Malignant mesothelioma (MM) is one of the most aggressive cancers with the poorest of outcomes. There is no doubt that mesothelioma in males is related to asbestos exposure, but some authors suggest that most of the cases diagnosed in females are “idiopathic.” In our assessment of the science, the “low risk” of mesothelioma in females is because of the nonsystematic recording of exposure histories among females. Indeed, asbestos exposure is mentioned in only some of the studies that include females. We estimate the risk of MM among females to be close to that in males. The absence of detailed exposure histories should be rectified in future studies involving ​women. As a matter of social justice, the ongoing failure to recognize asbestos as the cause of a majority of cases of MM in females does them, and their kin, a profound disservice.

Metrics

11 Record Views
8 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
Logo image