Logo image
Manual Experience Shapes Object Representations
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Manual Experience Shapes Object Representations

Eiling Yee, Evangelia G. Chrysikou, Esther Hoffman and Sharon L. Thompson-Schill
Psychological science, v 24(6), pp 909-919
01 Jun 2013
PMID: 23633520
url
https://europepmc.org/articles/pmc4138717View
Accepted (AM)Open Access (License Unspecified) Open

Abstract

Psychology Psychology, Multidisciplinary Social Sciences
How do people represent object meaning? It is now uncontentious that thinking about manipulable objects (e.g., pencils) activates brain regions underlying action. But is this activation part of the meaning of these objects, or is it merely incidental? The research we report here shows that when the hands are engaged in a task involving motions that are incompatible with those used to interact with frequently manipulated objects, it is more difficult to think about those objectsbut not harder to think about infrequently manipulated objects (e.g., bookcases). Critically, the amount of manual experience with the object determines the amount of interference. These findings show that brain activity underlying manual action is part of, not peripheral to, the representation of frequently manipulated objects. Further, they suggest that people's ability to think about an object changes dynamically on the basis of the match between their (experience-based) mental representation of its meaning and whatever they are doing at that moment.

Metrics

13 Record Views
84 citations in Scopus

Details

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Psychology, Multidisciplinary
Logo image