Logo image
Back
Medium Power Density Blue Laser Photocoagulation for Vocal Fold Vascular Lesions
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Medium Power Density Blue Laser Photocoagulation for Vocal Fold Vascular Lesions

Bailey Balouch, Josette Graves, Lila Samuelson, Carley Parsons, Joseph Maurice, Mausumi Syamal, Ghiath Alnouri, Jaime Moore and Robert T. Sataloff
Journal of voice, Forthcoming
27 Aug 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2026.08.018
Featured in Collection :   Research Supported by Drexel Libraries' OA Programs
url
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2026.08.018View
Published, Version of Record (VoR) Open Access via Drexel Libraries Read and Publish Program 2026 Open CC BY V4.0

Abstract

blue laser KTP laser vascular lesion vocal fold vocal fold lesion
The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of blue laser (445-nm) at medium-power-density for treatment of vocal fold (VF) vascular lesions, and to compare outcomes to those of blue laser at lower power density and potassium-titanyl-phosphate (KTP) laser. A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients who had undergone medium-power-density blue laser (MPDBL) treatment for vascular lesions of the vocal fold between July 2022 to April 2024 at our voice center. The following variables were obtained: patient characteristics, strobovideolaryngoscopy (SVL) examination, operative notes, and postoperative visit data (post-op day, VF hemorrhage, VF vascular patterns, VF stiffness, and lesion recurrence). SVL examinations underwent blind review by three raters to assess vascular lesion improvement. Postoperative outcomes were compared to those reported previously by our center of low-power-density blue laser (LPDBL) and KTP laser. There were 31 subjects (9 male, 22 female) included in the MPDBL cohort. The average age was 39.9 ± 18.0 (range = 19-80). 23 subjects underwent bilateral VF laser ablation of vascular lesions, and eight underwent unilateral ablation for a total of 54 VFs operated on. Historical controls from previously published data were included. The control groups comprised 75 VFs treated with LPDBL, and 100 VFs treated with KTP laser. The surgical objective score was significantly lower in the MPDBL group compared to the LPDBL group and KTP group for all postoperative visits (p < 0.001). MPDBL was consistently associated with the lowest proportions of no edema at all postoperative time points, highest proportion of vocal fold stiffness at all time points, and the highest average VF hemorrhage scores. Cumulatively, 46.7% of patients in the LPDBL group had a recurrent lesion compared to 11.1% in the MPDBL group and 10.0% in the KTP laser group (p < 0.001). MPDBL improves lesion control to levels comparable to KTP, and it is better than LPDBL; but it loses the tissue‑sparing benefit and is associated with greater, and more persistent, adjacent tissue injury. Laser selection should be guided by the clinical goals of the patient and surgeon.

Metrics

3 Record Views

Details

Logo image