Logo image
Miranda comprehension in adults with mental retardation and the effects of feedback style on suggestibility
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Miranda comprehension in adults with mental retardation and the effects of feedback style on suggestibility

Michael J O'Connell, William Garmoe and Naomi E Sevin Goldstein
Law and human behavior, v 29(3), pp 359-369
Jun 2005
PMID: 15965633

Abstract

Suggestion Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Feedback Humans Intellectual Disability - diagnosis Adult Female Male Cognition Criminal Law
Interrogations present several major challenges to persons with mental retardation (MR). Sixty adults with mild MR completed measures of Miranda comprehension and tendency to yield to leading questions. In addition, suggestibility was assessed based on whether participants revised answers to questions in response to unfriendly, friendly, or neutral feedback to original responses. Furthermore, we examined how expressed confidence in answers to repeated questions varied with the type of feedback received. Results revealed that participants demonstrated marked difficulties understanding their Miranda rights and greater likelihood of changing answers to questions for which they received friendly feedback than for questions for which they received unfriendly or neutral feedback. Most participants who received positive reinforcement for their answers on a second trial expressed confidence about improvement from trial 1 to trial 2, although accuracy did not improve. Implications of these results are reviewed.

Metrics

10 Record Views
48 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Web of Science research areas
Law
Psychology, Social
Logo image