Journal article
Moral muting in US newspaper op-eds debating the attack on Iraq
Discourse & communication, v 2(2), pp 165-184
01 May 2008
Abstract
This article examines a distinct form of moral argumentation found to be common in a corpus of 500 editorials and opinion pieces written in 23 US newspapers and news magazines between August and October 2002 debating whether or not the US should attack Iraq. The purpose of the article is to delineate this communicative phenomenon, which we call moral muting. Moral muting occurs when a message either blunts the moral considerations involved in a case or presents an equivocal moral meaning. Moral muting overlaps with but is distinct from mitigation, and even when it involves mitigation, moral muting depends on devices that go beyond those generally associated with conversational mitigation. The examination of moral muting offered here contributes to a better understanding of moral communication in general and of the conduct of the American public sphere.
Metrics
Details
- Title
- Moral muting in US newspaper op-eds debating the attack on Iraq
- Creators
- Douglas V. Porpora - Drexel UniversityAlexander Nikolaev - Drexel University
- Publication Details
- Discourse & communication, v 2(2), pp 165-184
- Publisher
- Sage
- Number of pages
- 20
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Language
- English
- Academic Unit
- Communication
- Web of Science ID
- WOS:000272881500003
- Scopus ID
- 2-s2.0-42449156631
- Other Identifier
- 991019169628604721
InCites Highlights
Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:
- Web of Science research areas
- Communication