Logo image
Morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing fecal diversion as an adjunct to wound healing: a NSQIP comparison study
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing fecal diversion as an adjunct to wound healing: a NSQIP comparison study

Matthew E. Pontell, Robert Kucejko, Dane Scantling, Michael Weingarten and David Stein
European journal of plastic surgery, v 42(3), pp 283-290
01 Jun 2019
url
https://doi.org/10.3182/20140824-6-za-1003.01867View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)Maybe Open Access (Publisher Bronze) Open

Abstract

Life Sciences & Biomedicine Science & Technology Surgery
BackgroundFecal diversion for chronic, non-healing wounds improves quality of life, assists in wound healing, and helps to prepare for reconstructive surgery. While commonplace, little has been published regarding the safety of diversion in this patient subgroup. The purpose of this study is to elucidate the morbidity and mortality of fecal diversion for chronic wounds and to identify those patients with disproportionately high perioperative risk.MethodsRetrospective analyses were performed using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) database and an institutional database. The primary outcome analyzed was 30-day mortality and secondary outcomes included 30-day morbidity and readmission rate.ResultsEight hundred fifty-nine patients were identified in the NSQIP database who underwent diversion compared to 3990 who did not. In unmatched data, there were no significant differences in substantial 30-day morbidities. In matched data, diverted patients had a significantly lower perioperative mortality. Fifty-six patients were identified in the institutional review who were diverted for non-healing wounds. Fifty percent of patients with a preoperative ejection fraction of less than 30% died within 30days of surgery (LR 6.58, p=0.045).ConclusionsThe NSQIP review indicates that fecal diversion does not inherently increase 30-day perioperative morbidity or mortality. While 30-day morbidity remains high, the institutional review suggests that patients with cardiac dysfunction contribute to the majority of complications. As such, an ejection fraction less than 30% may be a relative contraindication to immediate diversion. Medical optimization and elective diversion should be considered whenever feasible.Level of Evidence: Level III, risk / prognostic study.

Metrics

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Web of Science research areas
Surgery
Logo image