Life Sciences & Biomedicine Ophthalmology Science & Technology
Purpose. To investigate myopia progression in Correction of Myopia Evaluation Trial (COMET) participants who switched to soft contact lenses (CLs) vs. remained in spectacles after the clinical trial ended.
Methods. Four hundred sixty-nine ethnically diverse, 6- to 11-year-old myopic children were randomly assigned to wear single vision lenses (SVLs) or progressive addition spectacle lenses (PALs) for 5 years as hart of COMET. Afterwards they could choose another lens type, including CLs. Data in this article are from 286 participants who wore their Original spectacle lenses for 6 years (n = 199) or wore CLs most or all the time between the 5- and 6-year visits (n = 87). Refractive error and axial length (AL) were measured after cycloplegia with 1% Tropicamide. The primary outcome was myopia progression between the 5- and 6-year visits. Two-year myopia progression was evalualed in a subset of 183 participants who wore the same lens type for an additional year. Myopia progression arc! AL were compared between the two lens groups using multiple linear regression.
Results. Participants in the two groups were similar with respect to age, ethnicity, myopia at 5-years, accommodation and phoria, but more girls switched to CLs Than remained in spectacles (h < 0.0001). Mean (+/- SD) myopia progression was higher (p = 0.003) after 1 year in the CL group 1-0.28 +/- 0.33 diopter (D)] than the spectacle group (-0.14 +/- 0.36 D), and remained higher after 2 years in the 2-year subset (-0.52 +/- 0.46 D vs. -0.25 +/- 0.39 D, h < 0.0001). Results were similar after adjustment for related factors. No significant differences in AL were found between groups after adjustment. Corneal curvature remained unchanged in both groups.
Conclusions. COMET children switching from glasses to CLs experienced a small, statistically significant but clinically inconsequential increase in myopia progression. (Optom Vis Sci 2009;86:741-747)
Myopia Progression in Children Wearing Spectacles vs. Switching to Contact Lenses
Creators
Wendy L. Marsh-Tootle - University of Alabama
Li Ming Dong - Stony Brook University
Leslie Hyman - Stony Brook University
Jane Gwiazda - New England Coll Optometry, Boston, MA USA
Katherine K. Weise - University of Alabama
Lynette Dias - Stony Brook University
Karen D. Fern - University of Houston
COMET Grp
Mitchell Scheiman - Pennsylvania College of Optometry (PCO)
Publication Details
Optometry and vision science, v 86(6), pp 741-747
Publisher
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Number of pages
7
Grant note
U10 EY011756; U10 EY011740; U10 EY011754; U10 EY011752; U10 EY011754-10; U10 EY011805 / NEI NIH HHS; United States Department of Health & Human Services; National Institutes of Health (NIH) - USA; NIH National Eye Institute (NEI)
U10EY011756 / NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE; United States Department of Health & Human Services; National Institutes of Health (NIH) - USA; NIH National Eye Institute (NEI)
Resource Type
Journal article
Language
English
Academic Unit
Pennsylvania College of Optometry (PCO)
Web of Science ID
WOS:000266658900033
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-68049096173
Other Identifier
991021900190504721
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
InCites Highlights
Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:
Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Ophthalmology
Research Home Page
Browse by research and academic units
Learn about the ETD submission process at Drexel
Learn about the Libraries’ research data management services