Logo image
Neonatal sepsis biomarkers: where are we now?
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Neonatal sepsis biomarkers: where are we now?

Margaret Gilfillan and Vineet Bhandari
Research and reports in neonatology, v 9
01 Jan 2019
url
https://doi.org/10.2147/rrn.s163082View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)CC BY-NC V4.0 Open
url
https://doi.org/10.2147/RRN.S163082View
Published, Version of Record (VoR) Open

Abstract

Life Sciences & Biomedicine Pediatrics Science & Technology
Given that neonatal sepsis remains an important factor contributing to mortality and morbidity in neonates, identification of accurate biomarkers to aid in its timely and accurate diagnosis is critical. In this review, we discuss the current evidence behind the use of biomarkers commonly used in clinical practice, as well as presenting recent developments in this area of research. Besides summarizing information regarding "traditional" biomarkers (eg, hematological indices, CRP, and other acute-phase reactants, cytokines), we provide the latest clinical status on some relatively "newer" biomarkers (eg, PCR- and "-omic" technology-based, biophysical biomarkers) in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. We believe that certain biophysical (RALIS, core-peripheral temperature differences) in combination with selective biochemical (procalcitonin, nCD64, presepsin) markers offer the best likelihood of being adopted for clinical use in the detection of neonatal sepsis in the near future. In addition, serial measurements of selective biochemical markers (procalcitonin, nCD64) offer promise in the decision to initiate and/or control the duration of antibiotic therapy. It is important to conduct adequately powered prospective multicenter studies to continue to establish the accuracy and safety of utilizing such biomarkers of neonatal sepsis so that appropriate and adequate therapy is tailored to each infant for optimal outcomes.

Metrics

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Web of Science research areas
Pediatrics
Logo image