Journal article
Non-heart-beating organ donation: a reply to Campbell and Weber
Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal, v 5(1), pp 43-49
Mar 1995
PMID: 11645297
Abstract
In the preceding commentary, Campbell and Weber raise two valid and important issues concerning non-heart-beating organ donation (NHBOD). First, because the procedure links withdrawal of life support and the potential for subsequent organ donation, the desire for organs may create a situation in which care of the dying individual has relatively less importance and the dying may receive suboptimal care. Second, even if concerns about care of the dying were dealt with adequately, there will not be enough non-heart-beating donors to significantly decrease the organ shortage that exists, making the procedure not worth the risk. We agree that attention to the important details of caring for the dying are, and must be, the primary concern of all health care workers caring for those individuals. Ensuring the patients' comfort, dignity, and autonomy, and providing for family and social support are the mainstays of this care. All policies for NHBOD should clearly support and mandate these concepts. Regarding the second concern, we agree that NHBOD is currently rare; however, evidence is increasing that this type of donation has great potential. Continued growth of the practice in this country will depend largely on public acceptance, which we believe will be directly influenced by whether the public perceives that care of the dying is not compromised by this procedure.
Metrics
2 Record Views
15 citations in Scopus
Details
- Title
- Non-heart-beating organ donation: a reply to Campbell and Weber
- Creators
- Michael A DeVitaRade VukmirJames V SnyderCheryl Graziano
- Publication Details
- Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal, v 5(1), pp 43-49
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Language
- English
- Academic Unit
- Emergency Medicine
- Scopus ID
- 2-s2.0-0029265402
- Other Identifier
- 991021903247504721