Logo image
Normalization of ground reaction forces
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Normalization of ground reaction forces

David R Mullineaux, Clare E Milner, Irene S Davis and Joseph Hamill
Journal of applied biomechanics, v 22(3), pp 230-233
Aug 2006
PMID: 17215554

Abstract

Adult Anthropometry - methods Body Weight - physiology Computer Simulation Data Interpretation, Statistical Female Foot - physiology Humans Models, Biological Models, Statistical Reference Values Running - physiology Stress, Mechanical
The appropriateness of normalizing data, as one method to reduce the effects of a covariate on a dependent variable, should be evaluated. Using ratio, 0.67-nonlinear, and fitted normalizations, the aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between ground reaction force variables and body mass (BM). Ground reaction forces were recorded for 40 female subjects running at 3.7 +/- 0.18 m x s(-1) (mass = 58 +/- 6 kg). The explained variance for mass to forces (peak-impact-vertical = 70%; propulsive-vertical = 27%; braking = 40%) was reduced to <0.1% for mass to ratio normalized forces (i.e., forces/BM1) with statistically significantly different power exponents (p < 0.05). The smaller covariate effect of mass on loading rate variables of 2-16% was better removed through fitted normalization (e.g., vertical-instantaneous-loading rate/ BM(0.69+/-0.93); +/-95% CI) with nonlinear power exponents ranging from 0.51 to 1.13. Generally, these were similar to 0.67 as predicted through dimensionality theory, but, owing to the large confidence intervals, these power exponents were not statistically significantly different from absolute or ratio normalized data (p > 0.05). Further work is warranted to identify the appropriate method to normalize loading rates either to mass or to another covariate. Ratio normalization of forces to mass, as predicted through Newtonian mechanics, is recommended for comparing subjects of different masses.

Metrics

8 Record Views
46 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#5 Gender Equality

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Engineering, Biomedical
Sport Sciences
Logo image