Logo image
Objective method to report planner-independent skin/rib maximal dose in balloon-based high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy for breast cancer
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Objective method to report planner-independent skin/rib maximal dose in balloon-based high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy for breast cancer

Yongbok Kim and Mark G. Trombetta
Medical physics (Lancaster), v 38(4), pp 2053-2057
Apr 2011
PMID: 21626938
url
https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3568927View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)Maybe Open Access (Publisher Bronze) Open

Abstract

rib maximal dose skin maximal dose balloon-based HDR brachytherapy manual selection method objective method
Purpose: An objective method was proposed and compared with a manual selection method to determine planner-independent skin and rib maximal dose in balloon-based high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy planning. Methods: The maximal dose to skin and rib was objectively extracted from a dose volume histogram (DVH) of skin and rib volumes. A virtual skin volume was produced by expanding the skin surface in three dimensions (3D) external to the breast with a certain thickness in the planning computed tomography (CT) images. Therefore, the maximal dose to this volume occurs on the skin surface the same with a conventional manual selection method. The rib was also delineated in the planning CT images and its maximal dose was extracted from its DVH. The absolute ( Abdiff = | D max Man − D max DVH | ) and relative ( Rediff [ % ] = 100 × ( | D max Man − D max DVH | ) / D max DVH ) maximal skin and rib dose differences between the manual selection method ( D max Man ) and the objective method ( D max DVH ) were measured for 50 balloon-based HDR (25 MammoSite® and 25 Contura®) patients. Results: The average ± standard deviation of maximal dose difference was 1.67 % ± 1.69 % of the prescribed dose (PD). No statistical difference was observed between MammoSite® and Contura® patients for both Abdiff and Rediff[%] values. However, a statistically significant difference ( p value < 0.0001 ) was observed in maximal rib dose difference compared with maximal skin dose difference for both Abdiff ( 2.30 % ± 1.71 % vs 1.05 % ± 1.43 % ) and Rediff[%] ( 2.32 % ± 1.79 % vs 1.21 % ± 1.41 % ). In general, rib has a more irregular contour and it is more proximally located to the balloon for 50 HDR patients. Due to the inverse square law factor, more dose difference was observed in higher dose range ( D max > 90 % ) compared with lower dose range ( D max < 90 % ) : 2.16 % ± 1.93 % vs 1.19 % ± 1.25 % with p value of 0.0049. However, the Rediff[%] analysis eliminated the inverse square factor and there was no statistically significant difference ( p   value = 0.8931 ) between high and low dose ranges. Conclusions: The objective method using volumetric information of skin and rib can determine the planner-independent maximal dose compared with the manual selection method. However, the difference was < 2 % of PD, on average, if appropriate attention is paid to selecting a manual dose point in 3D planning CT images.

Metrics

5 Record Views
3 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Logo image