Logo image
Optimization of Fused Filament Fabrication Process Parameters to Improve the Compressive Properties of PEEK and PEKK Biomaterials
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Optimization of Fused Filament Fabrication Process Parameters to Improve the Compressive Properties of PEEK and PEKK Biomaterials

Abigail Tetteh, James Anthony Smith, Hannah Spece, Daniel Porter, Matthew Di Prima and Steven M Kurtz
Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, v 173, 107203
Jan 2026
PMID: 40987056
Featured in Collection :   Research Supported by Drexel Libraries' OA Programs
url
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2025.107203View
Published, Version of Record (VoR) Open Access via Drexel Libraries Read and Publish Program 2025 Open CC BY V4.0

Abstract

Fused filament fabrication Additive manufacturing Polyether-ether-ketone Polyether-ketone-ketone Taguchi design of experiment Compressive properties Crystallinity Manufacturing (Mechanical Engineering) Materials Preparation or Fabrication
Fused filament fabrication (FFF) is increasingly being adopted to create polymeric orthopedic devices. FFF process parameters determine the mechanical performance of final printed parts; hence, optimizing for appropriate levels of strength is critical for load-bearing applications. We utilized a Taguchi L-9 orthogonal array to investigate the impact of nozzle temperature (TN), chamber temperature (TCh), layer height (LH), and print speed (PS) on the compressive properties of cylindrical polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) and polyether-ketone-ketone (PEKK). The printed specimens were examined using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and differential scanning calorimetry to understand the effect of the printing parameters on their macrostructures. The optimized parameter combination for the elastic modulus (E) of PEEK and PEKK was 390˚C TN, (190˚C–PEEK, 110˚C–PEKK) TCh, 0.1mm LH, and 1000mm/min PS, with LH and PS having the most impact on their stiffness. For the offset yield strength (YS), the optimized parameters were (410˚C–PEEK, 400˚C–PEKK) TN, (210˚C–PEEK, 150˚C – PEKK) TCh, 0.1mm LH, and (1000mm/min–PEEK, 1500mm/min – PEKK) PS, with TN, TCh, and LH significantly impacting both materials. Elevated thermal conditions enhanced the strength of both materials; however, in PEEK, this was achieved by slowing down its crystallization kinetics, while in PEKK, it increased tendency for crystallization. The print conditions significantly affected the crystallinity of PEKK but not PEEK. Additionally, the highest E of PEEK and PEKK were 113% and 106% of the expected value of unreinforced PEEK, whereas the highest YS were 132% and 120%, respectively, indicating PEKK’s potential for spinal cage applications.

Metrics

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#9 Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Engineering, Biomedical
Materials Science, Biomaterials
Logo image