Logo image
Back
Percutaneous pigtail catheter versus chest tube for the treatment of pediatric traumatic hemothorax: An Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma multicenter study
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Percutaneous pigtail catheter versus chest tube for the treatment of pediatric traumatic hemothorax: An Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma multicenter study

Laura F. Goodman, Alice M. Martino, John Schomberg, Jason D. Sciarretta, Mari Freedberg, Adora Santos, Sharven Taghavi, Martin Tafazoli, David V. Shatz, Kathleen E. Doyle, …
The journal of trauma and acute care surgery, v 99(6), pp 850-858
Dec 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004775
PMID: 40956282
Featured in Collection :   UN Sustainable Development Goals @ Drexel
url
https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004775View
Published, Version of Record (VoR) Open

Abstract

hemothorax pediatric trauma pigtail catheter Chest tube
BACKGROUND Small percutaneously placed pigtail catheters (PCs) for traumatic hemothorax (HTX) are safe and effective in adults but have not been evaluated in children. We hypothesized that PC would have similar efficacy and complication rates compared with chest tubes (CTs). METHODS A retrospective study of hemodynamically stable pediatric trauma patients (younger than 18 years) with HTX or hemopneumothorax was conducted at 41 trauma centers (January 2010 to December 2022). Catheter failure was defined as a requirement for surgery, additional tube placement, or thrombolytics. Multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusting for age, sex, mechanism of injury, and Injury Severity Score (ISS) was used to evaluate the associated risk of failure. RESULTS Of 548 patients, 477 had CT and 71 PC. The median age (CT: 15.7 vs. PC: 15.6, p = 0.49) and ISS (CT: 17 vs. PC: 16, p = 0.17) were similar between cohorts. Penetrating trauma patients more often received CTs (62.6% vs. 35.2%, p < 0.0001). Failure rate was similar between CT versus PC (17.6% vs. 12.6%, p = 0.38). While the overall complication rate (respiratory distress, effusion, empyema, pneumonia, infection, deep venous thrombosis) was higher in the PC group on univariate analysis (19.7% vs. 11.9% in CT, p = 0.02), the risk of complications was not increased on multivariable analysis (odds ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-1.15; p = 0.3). Length of stay and intensive care unit length of stay were similar between cohorts (all p > 0.05). Logistic regression analysis revealed that PC was not associated with the risk of failure (odds ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-1.04; p = 0.31). There was an increased risk of complications with ISS of >15 (odds ratio, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.26; p < 0.0001) and lower risk with penetrating injury (odds ratio, 0.86; 95%confidence interval, 0.80-0.92; p = 0.0001). CONCLUSION There was no difference in risk of failure between PC and CT for pediatric HTX/hemopneumothorax and no difference in risk of complications after adjustment for confounders. Pigtail catheters had similar safety and efficacy compared with larger-bore CTs in this large multi-institutional study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV. Multicenter study of pigtail catheters vs chest tubes for pediatric traumatic hemothorax finds no differences in failure rate or outcomes. Pigtail catheters are an effective treatment for stable pediatric trauma patients with hemothorax.

Metrics

13 Record Views
1 citations in Web of Science

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Critical Care Medicine
Surgery
Logo image