Logo image
Phase-field modeling of fracture and healing in BioFiber-Reinforced Concrete
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Phase-field modeling of fracture and healing in BioFiber-Reinforced Concrete

Amirreza Sadighi, Sean Kerrane, Hsiao Wei Lee, Li Meng, Mohammad Houshmand Khaneghahi, Seyed Ali Rahmaninezhad, Divya Sree Kamireddi, Yaghoob “Amir” Farnam, Christopher Sales, Caroline L Schauer, …
International journal of mechanical sciences, v 301, 110447
Sep 2025
url
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2025.110447View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)Open Access via Drexel Libraries Read and Publish Program 2025CC BY-NC V4.0 Open

Abstract

Fiber-reinforced concrete Finite element method Self-healing concrete Phase-field fracture Fracture mechanics
Self-healing concrete has been extensively studied for its potential to reduce maintenance and reconstruction costs, with various strategies developed to embed healing functionality. As an alternative to vascular networks, which may compromise mechanical performance due to stress concentrations around internal channels, BioFiber Reinforced Concrete (BioFRC) introduces a damage-responsive and self-activated healing mechanism through embedded bioengineered fibers. Given the structural complexity of these fibers, a detailed numerical simulation is necessary to evaluate their fracture and healing behavior. In this study, the phase-field method is employed to simulate the damage-healing response of BioFRC, where each fiber comprises a PVA core, a middle coating layer (endospore-laden hydrogel sheath), and an outer polymeric shell that protects the inner components, a system that has not been thoroughly examined before. A parametric study is conducted across ten models with varying fiber permutations to assess the influence of hydrogel material behavior (i.e., quasi-brittle when dry and viscous when wet), fiber geometrical features, healing time (associated healing ratio), and the mechanical properties of the microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICCP), which is the healing end-product. Results show that the transition to a viscous hydrogel significantly reduces fracture resistance, while longer fibers with thinner coatings enhance energy absorption and peak force. Additionally, both healing duration (e.g., one-week vs. four-week healing) and MICCP stiffness critically affect recovery performance. These findings provide quantitative insights into the mechanical performance of BioFRCs. They also inform manufacturing strategies aimed at optimizing design by leveraging both the peak load capacity prior to fracture and the recovery behavior following fiber breakage and healing.

Metrics

Details

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Web of Science research areas
Engineering, Mechanical
Mechanics
Logo image