Logo image
Pitfalls in brain age analyses
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Pitfalls in brain age analyses

Ellyn R Butler, Andrew Chen, Rabie Ramadan, Trang T Le, Kosha Ruparel, Tyler M Moore, Theodore D Satterthwaite, Fengqing Zhang, Haochang Shou, Ruben C Gur, …
Human brain mapping, v 42(13), pp 4092-4101
Sep 2021
PMID: 34190372
url
https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25533View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)CC BY-NC V4.0 Open

Abstract

Age Factors Brain - diagnostic imaging Brain - physiology Humans Models, Theoretical Neuroimaging - methods
Over the past decade, there has been an abundance of research on the difference between age and age predicted using brain features, which is commonly referred to as the "brain age gap." Researchers have identified that the brain age gap, as a linear transformation of an out-of-sample residual, is dependent on age. As such, any group differences on the brain age gap could simply be due to group differences on age. To mitigate the brain age gap's dependence on age, it has been proposed that age be regressed out of the brain age gap. If this modified brain age gap is treated as a corrected deviation from age, model accuracy statistics such as R will be artificially inflated to the extent that it is highly improbable that an R value below .85 will be obtained no matter the true model accuracy. Given the limitations of proposed brain age analyses, further theoretical work is warranted to determine the best way to quantify deviation from normality.

Metrics

10 Record Views
59 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Neuroimaging
Neurosciences
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Logo image