Logo image
Post-approval Safety Surveillance Study of Golimumab in the Treatment of Rheumatic Disease Using a United States Healthcare Claims Database
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Post-approval Safety Surveillance Study of Golimumab in the Treatment of Rheumatic Disease Using a United States Healthcare Claims Database

Najat J. Ziyadeh, Anja Geldhof, Wim Noel, Marijo Otero-Lobato, Suzan Esslinger, Soumya D. Chakravarty, Yiting Wang and John D. Seeger
Clinical drug investigation, v 40(11), pp 1021-1040
01 Nov 2020
PMID: 32779120
url
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-020-00959-7View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)CC BY-NC V4.0 Open

Abstract

Life Sciences & Biomedicine Pharmacology & Pharmacy Science & Technology
Background and Objective Golimumab is a fully human anti-tumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). This study estimated rates of prespecified outcomes in patients with RA, PsA or AS initiating golimumab versus matched patients initiating non-biologic systemic (NBS) medications. Methods Patients enrolled in a US health plan with rheumatic disease who initiated a study medication were accrued between April 2009 and November 2014. Golimumab initiators were matched by propensity score to NBS initiators in a 1:4 ratio. Outcomes were identified through September 2015. As-treated, as-matched, and nested case-control (NCC) analyses were conducted in the matched cohorts. Sensitivity analyses evaluated the impact of residual confounding and nondifferential misclassification of exposure and outcomes. Results Risks of outcomes were similar between golimumab and NBS initiators. In the as-treated analysis, the rate ratio (RR) for depression was elevated during current golimumab use versus golimumab non-use in the NBS cohort [RR 1.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.31-1.61]. This finding was not replicated in as-matched (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.97-1.19) or NCC (odds ratio 1.01, 95% CI 0.78-1.31) analyses, which focused on incident cases. Sensitivity analyses suggest that depression was sensitive to misclassification, and the RR changed from greater than to less than one across a plausible range of specificity. Conclusions This study suggests that there is no association between exposure to golimumab and an increased risk of prespecified outcomes. Increased depression risk in the as-treated analysis was not replicated in other analyses and may be associated with residual imbalance in baseline history or severity of depression.

Metrics

8 Record Views
4 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Industry collaboration
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Pharmacology & Pharmacy
Logo image