Logo image
Post damage in contemporary posterior-stabilized tibial inserts: influence of implant design and clinical relevance
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Post damage in contemporary posterior-stabilized tibial inserts: influence of implant design and clinical relevance

Francisco J Medel, Steven M Kurtz, Peter F Sharkey, Matthew S Austin, Gregg R Klein, Alexis R Cohen, Hina Patel, Victor M Goldberg, Matthew J Kraay, Implant Res Ctr Writing Comm, …
The Journal of arthroplasty, v 26(4), pp 606-614
01 Jun 2011
PMID: 21575793

Abstract

The mechanisms of damage at the polyethylene post in 3 contemporary tibial insert designs were evaluated and compared with a historical standard (Insall-Burstein II; Zimmer, Warsaw, Ind). One hundred five gamma sterilized posterior-stabilized tibial inserts were revised after an average of 4.7 years (0.05-13.6 years). Retrievals were classified according to their designs: Insall-Burstein II (n = 28); PFC (Johnson & Johnson, Raynham, Mass; n = 30); NexGen (Zimmer; n = 32); and Scorpio (Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, NJ; n = 15). Reasons for revision and patient details were available. Surface damage scoring and photogrammetry were performed on all the retrieved tibial inserts. Oxidation analysis was carried out for traceable historical, gamma air-sterilized and conventional, gamma inert-sterilized tibial inserts (n = 61) with the use of infrared spectroscopy. The posts for all 3 contemporary designs exhibited damage similar to the historical controls. Articular, post, and backside damage scores significantly increased with implantation time. Post damage was insensitive to design and patient factors but was exacerbated by oxidation. An association between damage at the post and articular surface was also confirmed. Logistic models suggested an interaction between post damage, backside surface damage, and implant loosening.

Metrics

10 Record Views
13 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Industry collaboration
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Orthopedics
Logo image