Logo image
Potential Risks of Ecological Momentary Assessment Among Persons Who Inject Drugs
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Potential Risks of Ecological Momentary Assessment Among Persons Who Inject Drugs

Alexis M. Roth, John Rossi, Jesse L. Goldshear, Quan Truong, Richard F. Armenta, Stephen E. Lankenau, Richard S. Garfein and Janie Simmons
Substance use & misuse, v 52(7), pp 840-847
07 Jun 2017
PMID: 28426353
url
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9540984View
Accepted (AM)Open Access (License Unspecified) Open

Abstract

ethics mHealth persons who inject drugs polydrug use risks
Background: Ecological momentary assessment (EMA)-which often involves brief surveys delivered via mobile technology-has transformed our understanding of the individual and contextual micro-processes associated with legal and illicit drug use. However, little empirical research has focused on participant's perspective on the probability and magnitude of potential risks in EMA studies. Objectives: To garner participant perspectives on potential risks common to EMA studies of illicit drug use. Methods: We interviewed 38 persons who inject drugs living in San Diego (CA) and Philadelphia (PA), United States. They completed simulations of an EMA tool and then underwent a semi-structured interview that systematically explored domains of risk considered within the proposed revisions to the Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects or the "Common Rule." Interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded systematically to explore psychological, physical, social, legal, and informational risks from participation. Results: Participants perceived most risks to be minimal. Some indicated that repetitive questioning about mood or drug use could cause psychological (i.e., anxiety) or behavioral risks (i.e., drug use relapse). Ironically, the questions that were viewed as risky were considered motivational to engage in healthy behaviors. The most cited risks were legal and social risks stemming from participant concerns about data collection and security. Importance: Improving our understanding of these issues is an essential first step to protect human participants in future EMA research. We provide a brief set of recommendations that can aid in the design and ethics review of the future EMA protocol with substance using populations.

Metrics

8 Record Views
12 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Industry collaboration
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Psychiatry
Psychology
Substance Abuse
Logo image