Journal article
Preexisting knowledge versus on-line learning: what do young infants really know about spatial location?
Psychological science, v 16(3)
Mar 2005
PMID: 15733203
Abstract
Contemporary knowledge of infant cognition relies heavily on violation-of-expectation experiments. However, there are two ways to conceptualize what occurs in such studies. Babies may react to anomalous test events because of preexisting world knowledge. Alternatively, they may react because they have learned about events during the familiarization period. One way to distinguish these possibilities is to contrast familiarization with everyday versus anomalous events. In the studies we report here, we used this method to probe the nature of 5-month-olds' expectations about the locations of objects hidden in sand and later revealed. In Experiment 1, infants who initially saw everyday events did react to anomalous ones, as found previously, whereas infants who initially saw anomalous events did not react to everyday events. In Experiment 2, two alternative explanations of this pattern were ruled out. We conclude that by the age of 5 months, infants have expectations regarding the location of objects in continuous space.
Metrics
Details
- Title
- Preexisting knowledge versus on-line learning: what do young infants really know about spatial location?
- Creators
- Nora S Newcombe - Temple UniversityJulia Sluzenski - Temple UniversityJanellen Huttenlocher - University of Chicago
- Publication Details
- Psychological science, v 16(3)
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Language
- English
- Academic Unit
- Psychological and Brain Sciences (Psychology)
- Web of Science ID
- WOS:000227174400009
- Scopus ID
- 2-s2.0-15944401768
- Other Identifier
- 991021229909004721
InCites Highlights
Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:
- Collaboration types
- Domestic collaboration
- Web of Science research areas
- Psychology, Multidisciplinary