Journal article
Pregnancy Outcomes of Nifedipine Compared With Labetalol for Oral Treatment of Mild Chronic Hypertension
Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953), v 144(1), pp 126-134
Jul 2024
PMID: 38949541
Featured in Collection : UN Sustainable Development Goals @ Drexel
Abstract
To evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes by type of antihypertensive used in participants of the CHAP (Chronic Hypertension in Pregnancy) trial.
We conducted a planned secondary analysis of CHAP, an open-label, multicenter, randomized trial of antihypertensive treatment compared with standard care (no treatment unless severe hypertension developed) in pregnant patients with mild chronic hypertension (blood pressure 140-159/90-104 mm Hg before 20 weeks of gestation) and singleton pregnancies. We performed three comparisons based on medications prescribed at enrollment: labetalol compared with standard care, nifedipine compared with standard care, and labetalol compared with nifedipine. Although active compared with standard care groups were randomized, medication assignment within the active treatment group was not random but based on clinician or patient preference. The primary outcome was the occurrence of superimposed preeclampsia with severe features, preterm birth before 35 weeks of gestation, placental abruption, or fetal or neonatal death. The key secondary outcome was small for gestational age (SGA) neonates. We also compared medication adverse effects between groups. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs were estimated with log binomial regression to adjust for confounding.
Of 2,292 participants analyzed, 720 (31.4%) received labetalol, 417 (18.2%) received nifedipine, and 1,155 (50.4%) received no treatment. The mean gestational age at enrollment was 10.5±3.7 weeks; nearly half of participants (47.5%) identified as non-Hispanic Black; and 44.5% used aspirin. The primary outcome occurred in 217 (30.1%), 130 (31.2%), and 427 (37.0%) in the labetalol, nifedipine, and standard care groups, respectively. Risk of the primary outcome was lower among those receiving treatment (labetalol use vs standard adjusted RR 0.82, 95% CI, 0.72-0.94; nifedipine use vs standard adjusted RR 0.84, 95% CI, 0.71-0.99), but there was no significant difference in risk when labetalol was compared with nifedipine (adjusted RR 0.98, 95% CI, 0.82-1.18). There were no significant differences in SGA or serious adverse events between participants receiving labetalol and those receiving nifedipine.
No significant differences in predetermined maternal or neonatal outcomes were detected on the basis of the use of labetalol or nifedipine for treatment of chronic hypertension in pregnancy.
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02299414.
Metrics
1 Record Views
Details
- Title
- Pregnancy Outcomes of Nifedipine Compared With Labetalol for Oral Treatment of Mild Chronic Hypertension
- Creators
- Ayodeji A Sanusi - St. Luke's University Health NetworkJustin Leach - St. Luke's University Health NetworkKim Boggess - St. Luke's University Health NetworkLorraine Dugoff - St. Luke's University Health NetworkBaha Sibai - St. Luke's University Health NetworkKirsten Lawrence - St. Luke's University Health NetworkBrenna L Hughes - St. Luke's University Health NetworkJoseph Bell - St. Luke's University Health NetworkKjersti Aagaard - St. Luke's University Health NetworkRodney K Edwards - St. Luke's University Health NetworkKelly S Gibson - St. Luke's University Health NetworkDavid M Haas - St. Luke's University Health NetworkLauren Plante - St. Luke's University Health NetworkTorri D Metz - St. Luke's University Health NetworkBrian Casey - St. Luke's University Health NetworkSean Esplin - St. Luke's University Health NetworkSherri Longo - St. Luke's University Health NetworkMatthew K Hoffman - St. Luke's University Health NetworkGeorge R Saade - St. Luke's University Health NetworkKara K Hoppe - St. Luke's University Health NetworkJanelle Foroutan - St. Luke's University Health NetworkMethodius Tuuli - St. Luke's University Health NetworkMichelle Y Owens - St. Luke's University Health NetworkHyagriv N Simhan - St. Luke's University Health NetworkHeather Frey - St. Luke's University Health NetworkTodd Rosen - St. Luke's University Health NetworkAnna Palatnik - St. Luke's University Health NetworkSusan Baker - St. Luke's University Health NetworkPhyllis August - Cornell UniversityUma M Reddy - St. Luke's University Health NetworkEmily J Su - St. Luke's University Health NetworkIris Krishna - St. Luke's University Health NetworkNguyet A Nguyen - St. Luke's University Health NetworkMary E Norton - St. Luke's University Health NetworkDaniel Skupski - St. Luke's University Health NetworkYasser Y El-Sayed - St. Luke's University Health NetworkDotun Ogunyemi - St. Luke's University Health NetworkZorina S Galis - St. Luke's University Health NetworkLorie Harper - St. Luke's University Health NetworkNamasivayam Ambalavanan - St. Luke's University Health NetworkNancy L Geller - St. Luke's University Health NetworkHui-Chien KuoRachel G Sinkey - St. Luke's University Health NetworkRonald Librizzi - St. Luke's University Health NetworkLeonardo Pereira - St. Luke's University Health NetworkEverett F Magann - St. Luke's University Health NetworkMounira Habli - St. Luke's University Health NetworkShauna Williams - St. Luke's University Health NetworkGiancarlo Mari - St. Luke's University Health NetworkGabriella Pridjian - St. Luke's University Health NetworkDavid S McKenna - St. Luke's University Health NetworkMarc Parrish - St. Luke's University Health NetworkEugene Chang - St. Luke's University Health NetworkSarah Osmundson - St. Luke's University Health NetworkJoAnne Quinones - St. Luke's University Health NetworkJeff M Szychowski - St. Luke's University Health NetworkAlan T N Tita - St. Luke's University Health Network
- Publication Details
- Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953), v 144(1), pp 126-134
- Publisher
- Ovid
- Grant note
- K23 HL159331 / NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL120338 / NHLBI NIH HHS UL1 TR001863 / NCATS NIH HHS
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Language
- English
- Academic Unit
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Web of Science ID
- WOS:001256808200006
- Scopus ID
- 2-s2.0-85197652912
- Other Identifier
- 991022202519704721
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
Source: SDGs in the Output
InCites Highlights
Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:
- Collaboration types
- Domestic collaboration
- Web of Science research areas
- Obstetrics & Gynecology