Logo image
Proposed Performance-Based Metrics for the Future Funding of Graduate Medical Education: Starting the Conversation
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Proposed Performance-Based Metrics for the Future Funding of Graduate Medical Education: Starting the Conversation

Kelly J. Caverzagie, Susan W. Lane, Niraj Sharma, John Donnelly, Jeffrey R. Jaeger, Heather Laird-Fick, John P. Moriarty, Darilyn V. Moyer, Sara L. Wallach, Richard M. Wardrop, …
Academic medicine, v 93(7), pp 1002-1013
01 Jul 2018
PMID: 29239903
url
https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002096View
Published, Version of Record (VoR) Restricted

Abstract

Education & Educational Research Education, Scientific Disciplines Health Care Sciences & Services Life Sciences & Biomedicine Science & Technology Social Sciences
Graduate medical education (GME) in the United States is financed by contributions from both federal and state entities that total over $15 billion annually. Within institutions, these funds are distributed with limited transparency to achieve ill-defined outcomes. To address this, the Institute of Medicine convened a committee on the governance and financing of GME to recommend finance reform that would promote a physician training system that meets society's current and future needs. The resulting report provided several recommendations regarding the oversight and mechanisms of GME funding, including implementation of performance-based GME payments, but did not provide specific details about the content and development of metrics for these payments. To initiate a national conversation about performance-based GME funding, the authors asked: What should GME be held accountable for in exchange for public funding? In answer to this question, the authors propose 17 potential performance-based metrics for GME funding that could inform future funding decisions. Eight of the metrics are described as exemplars to add context and to help readers obtain a deeper understanding of the inherent complexities of performance-based GME funding. The authors also describe considerations and precautions for metric implementation.

Metrics

7 Record Views
13 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#4 Quality Education

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Education, Scientific Disciplines
Health Care Sciences & Services
Logo image