Logo image
Psychological interventions for internalized weight stigma: a systematic scoping review of feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Psychological interventions for internalized weight stigma: a systematic scoping review of feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy

Laura D'Adamo, Abigail T. Shonrock, Lawrence Monocello, Jake Goldberg, Lauren H. Yaeger, Rebecca L. Pearl and Denise E. Wilfley
Journal of eating disorders, v 12(1), 197
29 Nov 2024
PMID: 39614347
url
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-024-01132-7View
Published, Version of Record (VoR) Open

Abstract

Life Sciences & Biomedicine Nutrition & Dietetics Psychology, Clinical Science & Technology Psychiatry Psychology Social Sciences
BackgroundInternalized weight stigma (IWS) is highly prevalent and associated with deleterious mental and physical health outcomes. Initiatives are needed to address IWS and promote effective coping and resilience among individuals who are exposed to weight stigma. We conducted a systematic scoping review of the literature on psychological interventions for IWS and explored their intervention components, feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy at reducing IWS and related negative physiological and psychological health outcomes.MethodsEight databases were searched. Inclusion criteria included: (1) Psychological intervention; (2) Published in English; and (3) Included IWS as an outcome. Exclusion criteria included: (1) Commentary or review; and (2) Not a psychological intervention. A narrative review framework was used to synthesize results.ResultsOf 161 articles screened, 20 were included. Included interventions demonstrated high feasibility, acceptability, and engagement overall. Sixteen of 20 included studies observed significant reductions in IWS that were maintained over follow-up periods, yet data on whether interventions produced greater reductions than control conditions were mixed. Studies observed significant improvements in numerous physical and mental health outcomes.ConclusionsFindings suggest that existing interventions are feasible, acceptable, and may provide meaningful improvements in IWS and associated health outcomes, highlighting the potential for psychological interventions to promote improved health and wellbeing in individuals with IWS. High-quality studies using rigorous study designs (e.g., randomized controlled trials) are needed to further evaluate the efficacy of interventions for IWS.

Metrics

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being
#5 Gender Equality

Source: SDGs in the Output

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Nutrition & Dietetics
Psychiatry
Psychology, Clinical
Logo image