Logo image
Pulmonary Function Testing in Dentists Versus Controls A Pilot Study Exploring the Potential Respiratory-Related Occupational Hazards of Dentistry
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Pulmonary Function Testing in Dentists Versus Controls A Pilot Study Exploring the Potential Respiratory-Related Occupational Hazards of Dentistry

Maricel Dela Cruz, Muhammed Ershad, Ahmed Mostafa, Rita McKeever and David Vearrier
Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, v 61(11), pp 924-926
01 Nov 2019
PMID: 31464815

Abstract

Life Sciences & Biomedicine Public, Environmental & Occupational Health Science & Technology
Objective: Minimal research exists evaluating respiratory-related occupational hazards associated with dentistry in the United States. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pulmonary function of dentists as compared with controls. Methods: This is a case-control study evaluating pulmonary function in dentists versus controls. Outcomes included measurements of percent predicted FEV1 (FEV1%), percent of predicted FVC (FVC%), and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC). Results: Our findings indicate that dentists had a statistically significant lower percent predicted FEV1% (P < 0.05) and FVC% (P < 0.05) compared with controls. The prevalence of abnormal FVC% and FEV1% was greater among dentists, but only the increase in abnormal FEV1% approached significance. Conclusions: Dentists had lower percent predicted values for FVC% and FEV1% versus controls. More research is required to further investigate the association between the dental profession and pulmonary function in dentists.

Metrics

7 Record Views

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Web of Science research areas
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
Logo image