Logo image
Quantifying the primary care workforce in the U.S.: A validation study with and without an imperfectly measured referent standard
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Quantifying the primary care workforce in the U.S.: A validation study with and without an imperfectly measured referent standard

Nicole Rafalko, Scott D. Siegel, Paul Yerkes, Jan Eberth, Igor Burstyn and Neal Goldstein
Annals of epidemiology, v 108, pp 92-98
Aug 2025
PMID: 40562324
Featured in Collection :   Research Supported by Drexel Libraries' OA Programs
url
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.06.011View
Published, Version of Record (VoR) Open Access via Drexel Libraries Read and Publish Program 2025 Open CC BY-NC V4.0

Abstract

National provider identifier validation study accuracy health services research primary care providers primary care services
Purpose To validate the National Provider Identifier (NPI), a commonly used data source in health services research, for identifying primary care physicians, physician assistants (PAs), and nurse practitioners (NPs). Methods Validation studies to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, and associated 95% confidence intervals for physicians, PAs, and NPs. For physicians, Medicare claims data were used as an imperfectly measured referent standard. For PAs and NPs, we used a simulation-based method to estimate accuracy parameters that assumed the NPI and Medicare claims were equally misclassified. Results Using the Medicare claims as the referent standard for physicians yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.98) and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.73, 0.79), respectively. Using the simulation-based method yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 0.57 (95% CrI: 0.11, 0.97) and 0.56 (95% CrI: 0.10, 0.96), respectively for PAs and 0.58 (95% CrI: 0.13, 0.97) and 0.61 (95% CrI: 0.14, 0.97), respectively for NPs. Conclusions Our validation results varied by provider role. Accuracy was highest for physicians further highlighting the challenges in quantifying PAs and NPs based on their NPI alone. Failure to consider potential misclassification in the NPI may result in biased research findings.

Metrics

7 Record Views

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
Logo image