Logo image
Quantitative Evidence for Revising the Definition of Primary Graft Dysfunction after Lung Transplant
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Quantitative Evidence for Revising the Definition of Primary Graft Dysfunction after Lung Transplant

Edward Cantu, Joshua M. Diamond, Yoshikazu Suzuki, Jared Lasky, Christian Schaufler, Brian Lim, Rupal Shah, Mary Porteous, David J. Lederer, Steven M. Kawut, …
American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, v 197(2), pp 235-243
15 Jan 2018
PMID: 28872353
url
https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201706-1140ocView
Published, Version of Record (VoR)Open Access (License Unspecified) Open

Abstract

Critical Care Medicine General & Internal Medicine Life Sciences & Biomedicine Respiratory System Science & Technology
Rationale: Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a form of acute lung injury that occurs after lung transplantation. The definition of PGD was standardized in 2005. Since that time, clinical practice has evolved, and this definition is increasingly used as a primary endpoint for clinical trials; therefore, validation is warranted. Objectives: We sought to determine whether refinements to the 2005 consensus definition could further improve construct validity. Methods: Data from the Lung Transplant Outcomes Group multicenter cohort were used to compare variations on the PGD definition, including alternate oxygenation thresholds, inclusion of additional severity groups, and effects of procedure type and mechanical ventilation. Convergent and divergent validity were compared for mortality prediction and concurrent lung injury biomarker discrimination. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 1,179 subjects from 10 centers were enrolled from 2007 to 2012. Median length of follow-up was 4 years (interquartile range = 2.4-5.9). No mortality differences were noted between no PGD (grade 0) and mild PGD (grade 1). Significantly better mortality discrimination was evident for all definitions using later time points (48, 72, or 48-72 hours; P < 0.001). Biomarker divergent discrimination was superior when collapsing grades 0 and 1. Additional severity grades, use of mechanical ventilation, and transplant procedure type had minimal or no effect on mortality or biomarker discrimination. Conclusions: The PGD consensus definition can be simplified by combining lower PGD grades. Construct validity of grading was present regardless of transplant procedure type or use of mechanical ventilation. Additional severity categories had minimal impact on mortality or biomarker discrimination.

Metrics

18 Record Views
51 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Critical Care Medicine
Respiratory System
Logo image