Logo image
REPEAT MAMMOGRAPHY SCREENING AMONG UNMARRIED WOMEN WITH AND WITHOUT A DISABILITY
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

REPEAT MAMMOGRAPHY SCREENING AMONG UNMARRIED WOMEN WITH AND WITHOUT A DISABILITY

Melissa A. Clark, Michelle L. Rogers, Xiaozhong Wen, Victoria Wilcox, Kate McCarthy-Barnett, Jeanne Panarace, Carol Manning, Susan Allen and William Rakowski
Women's health issues, v 19(6), pp 415-424
01 Nov 2009
PMID: 19775912
url
https://europepmc.org/articles/pmc2783996?pdf=renderView
Accepted (AM)Open Access (License Unspecified) Open

Abstract

Life Sciences & Biomedicine Public, Environmental & Occupational Health Science & Technology Social Sciences Women's Studies
Objectives. Unmarried women with disabilities maybe a particularly vulnerable group for underutilization of repeat mammography screening. Our goal was to compare the breast cancer screening experiences of unmarried women with disabilities (WWD) versus women with no disabilities (WND), and determine whether these experiences are associated with adherence to repeat screening. Methods. We conducted a matched cohort study of 93 WWD and 93 WND to compare mammography experiences by disability status, examine rates of repeat mammography by disability status, and identify factors that are associated with repeat mammography. Results. WWD were less likely to be on-schedule than WND in univariable (54.8% vs. 71.0%; relative risk, 0.77; 95% confidence limits, 0.61, 0.97), but not multivariable, analyses. In multivariable analyses, there was a significant interaction between disability status and positive experiences as the reasons for returning to the same mammography facility. Among WND, repeat screening ranged from 59% to 86%, depending on the number of positive experiences endorsed (range, 1-5). In contrast, among WWD, screening rates were only 37% among those who did not report any positive experiences and increased to a maximum of 60% regardless of whether women endorsed one to four or all five positive experiences. Severity and type of disability were not associated with repeat screening. Conclusion. WWD may be less likely than WND to remain on-schedule for mammography. WWD who do not report any positive experiences as reasons for returning to a mammography facility may be at particularly high risk of underutilization of screening.

Metrics

4 Record Views
11 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Web of Science research areas
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
Women's Studies
Logo image