Logo image
Radiographic and clinical outcomes with particle or liquid embolic agents for middle meningeal artery embolization of nonacute subdural hematomas
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Radiographic and clinical outcomes with particle or liquid embolic agents for middle meningeal artery embolization of nonacute subdural hematomas

Jonathan P. Scoville, Evan Joyce, Daniel A. Tonetti, Michael T. Bounajem, Ajith Thomas, Christopher S. Ogilvy, Justin M. Moore, Howard A. Riina, Omar Tanweer, Elad I. Levy, …
Interventional neuroradiology, pp 159101992211046-15910199221104631
07 Jun 2022
PMID: 35673710
url
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10680958View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)Open Access (License Unspecified) Open

Abstract

Background Middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization is an apparently efficacious minimally invasive treatment for nonacute subdural hematomas (NASHs), but how different embolisates affect outcomes remains unclear. Our objective was to compare radiographic and clinical outcomes after particle or liquid MMA embolization. Methods Patients who had MMA embolization for NASH were retrospectively identified from a multi-institution database. The primary radiographic and clinical outcomes—50% NASH thickness reduction and need for surgical retreatment within 90 days, respectively—were compared for liquid and particle embolizations in patients treated 1) without surgical intervention (upfront), 2) after recurrence, or 3) with concomitant surgery (prophylactic). Results The upfront, recurrent, and prophylactic subgroups included 133, 59, and 16 patients, respectively. The primary radiographic outcome was observed in 61.8%, 61%, and 72.7% of particle-embolized patients and 61.3%, 55.6%, and 20% of liquid-embolized patients, respectively (p = 0.457, 0.819, 0.755). Hazard ratios comparing time to reach radiographic outcome in the particle and liquid groups or upfront, recurrent, andprophylactic timing were 1.31 (95% CI 0.78–2.18; p = 0.310), 1.09 (95% CI 0.52–2.27; p = 0.822), and 1.5 (95% CI 0.14–16.54; p = 0.74), respectively. The primary clinical outcome occurred in 8.0%, 2.4%, and 0% of patients who underwent particle embolization in the upfront, recurrent, and prophylactic groups, respectively, compared with 0%, 5.6%, and 0% who underwent liquid embolization (p = 0.197, 0.521, 1.00). Conclusions MMA embolization with particle and liquid embolisates appears to be equally effective in treatment of NASHs as determined by the percentage who reach, and the time to reach, 50% NASH thickness reduction and the incidence of surgical reintervention within 90 days.

Metrics

10 Record Views
18 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Clinical Neurology
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Logo image