Logo image
Reach and Power of Physician-Initiated Tweets in a Twitter Inflammatory Bowel Disease Community
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Reach and Power of Physician-Initiated Tweets in a Twitter Inflammatory Bowel Disease Community

Keerthana Kesavarapu, Asta Zelenkauskaite and Neilanjan Nandi
Crohn's & colitis 360, v 3(3)
01 Jul 2021
url
https://doi.org/10.1093/crocol/otab052View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)CC BY-NC V4.0 Open

Abstract

Abstract Background Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) specialist Twitter engagement and thematic content was assessed. Methods The nature of interaction between IBD specialists and users who responded to them was analyzed based on (1) content analysis of stakeholders who responded to them; (2) nature of interaction through a manual thematic content analysis of IBD specialist tweets and responses; (3) prominence of interaction by employing descriptive analysis and statistical inferences relative to the number of replies, likes, and retweets. Analyzed samples included of tweets (n = 320) compiled from 16 IBD specialists, and associated replies (n = 299), retweets (n = 869), and likes (n = 4068). Results Healthcare professionals (HCPs) more often engaged with peer-HCPs, compared to other stakeholders. When it comes to the nature of exchanges, of original tweets, the most common content was for knowledge sharing (58%) and endorsement (28%). In the knowledge sharing category, research accounted for more than half of those tweets (53%). Of replies, knowledge sharing occurred most frequently with a subtheme of IBD management (62%). Conclusions HCP–HCP Twitter engagement was more frequent than HCP–other Twitter stakeholder interaction. The primary purpose for this engagement was found to obtain real-time information, professionally network, and disseminate research.

Metrics

18 Record Views
3 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Logo image