Logo image
Reflective Decision-Making in Elementary Students' Engineering Design
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Reflective Decision-Making in Elementary Students' Engineering Design

Kristen Bethke Wendell, Christopher G. Wright and Patricia Paugh
Journal of engineering education (Washington, D.C.), v 106(3), pp 356-397
01 Jul 2017

Abstract

Education & Educational Research Education, Scientific Disciplines Engineering Engineering, Multidisciplinary Science & Technology Social Sciences Technology
Background A key feature of engineering design is collaborative, deliberate decision making that takes into account information about design options. K-12 students need opportunities for this kind of decision making if they are to meet the learning standards for engineering set out in the Next Generation Science Standards. Purpose This qualitative study sought to propose and operationalize a definition of reflective decision-making among elementary students. We investigated how urban elementary students enact reflective decision-making in a formal engineering design curriculum. Method We used naturalistic inquiry methodology and video recorded seven Engineering is Elementary design challenges in four classrooms. Students worked in small teams, and we focused on their planning and redesign phases. Maximum variation sampling, constant comparative analysis, and microethnographic accounts demonstrated the diversity of resources students utilized in their decision making. Results In student discourse, we found evidence for six reflective decision-making elements: articulating multiple solutions, evaluating pros and cons, intentionally selecting a solution, retelling the performance of a solution, analyzing a solution according to evidence, and purposefully choosing improvements. The discourse patterns used to enact these elements both supported and interfered with students' achievement of design goals. Conclusions Our results suggest that during engineering design tasks, young learners working in small teams can respond productively to opportunities to engage in sophisticated discourse. However, further work is needed on tools and strategies that support reflective decision-making by all students during engineering design in elementary school.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#4 Quality Education

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Education & Educational Research
Education, Scientific Disciplines
Engineering, Multidisciplinary
Logo image