Logo image
Relationships Among Dietary Cognitive Restraint, Food Preferences, and Reaction Times
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Relationships Among Dietary Cognitive Restraint, Food Preferences, and Reaction Times

Travis D. Masterson, John Brand, Michael R. Lowe, Stephen A. Metcalf, Ian W. Eisenberg, Jennifer A. Emond, Diane Gilbert-Diamond and Lisa A. Marsch
Frontiers in psychology, v 10, pp 2256-2256
09 Oct 2019
PMID: 31649589
url
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02256View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)CC BY V4.0 Open

Abstract

Psychology Psychology, Multidisciplinary Social Sciences
Objective: To assess the associations between dietary cognitive restraint, disinhibited eating, and how taste and health perceptions relate to food preference; and further, whether cognitive restraint and disinhibited eating are associated with food preference decision reaction time. Methods: Five hundred and seventeen adults participated in the study. Dietary cognitive restraint and disinhibited eating were assessed using the shortened Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ-R18). Participants also completed a dietary decision-making task to examine their food-related decisions. Participants were presented with 50 food items and asked to rate them for health and for taste. Participants were then presented with a reference food item and comparison items one at a time and asked to indicate which of the two foods they would prefer to eat. Results: Participants with higher levels of cognitive restraint were more sensitive to health perceptions whereas those with higher levels of disinhibited eating were more sensitive to taste perceptions when indicating food preference. Reaction time analysis corroborated these results. Being classified as high for cognitive restraint was associated with faster reaction times if the preferred food was rated as healthier than the referent food. Conversely, being classified as high for disinhibited eating was associated with faster reaction times if the preferred food was rated as tastier than the referent food. Conclusion: The dietary decision-making task appears to capture distinct aspects of dietary restraint and disinhibition and may be useful in future studies to measure and/or alter levels of dietary restraint and disinhibition.

Metrics

9 Record Views
15 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#5 Gender Equality
#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Psychology, Multidisciplinary
Logo image