Published, Version of Record (VoR)CC BY V4.0, Open
Abstract
Psychology Psychology, Multidisciplinary Social Sciences
Objective: To assess the associations between dietary cognitive restraint, disinhibited eating, and how taste and health perceptions relate to food preference; and further, whether cognitive restraint and disinhibited eating are associated with food preference decision reaction time.
Methods: Five hundred and seventeen adults participated in the study. Dietary cognitive restraint and disinhibited eating were assessed using the shortened Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ-R18). Participants also completed a dietary decision-making task to examine their food-related decisions. Participants were presented with 50 food items and asked to rate them for health and for taste. Participants were then presented with a reference food item and comparison items one at a time and asked to indicate which of the two foods they would prefer to eat.
Results: Participants with higher levels of cognitive restraint were more sensitive to health perceptions whereas those with higher levels of disinhibited eating were more sensitive to taste perceptions when indicating food preference. Reaction time analysis corroborated these results. Being classified as high for cognitive restraint was associated with faster reaction times if the preferred food was rated as healthier than the referent food. Conversely, being classified as high for disinhibited eating was associated with faster reaction times if the preferred food was rated as tastier than the referent food.
Conclusion: The dietary decision-making task appears to capture distinct aspects of dietary restraint and disinhibition and may be useful in future studies to measure and/or alter levels of dietary restraint and disinhibition.
Relationships Among Dietary Cognitive Restraint, Food Preferences, and Reaction Times
Creators
Travis D. Masterson - Dartmouth College
John Brand - Dartmouth College
Michael R. Lowe - Drexel University
Stephen A. Metcalf - Dartmouth College
Ian W. Eisenberg - Stanford University
Jennifer A. Emond - Dartmouth College
Diane Gilbert-Diamond - Dartmouth College
Lisa A. Marsch - Dartmouth College
Publication Details
Frontiers in psychology, v 10, pp 2256-2256
Publisher
Frontiers Media Sa
Number of pages
11
Grant note
P30DA029926 / NIDA; United States Department of Health & Human Services; National Institutes of Health (NIH) - USA; NIH National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
T32DA037202 / NIH through a NIDA postdoctoral fellowship
P30DA029926 / NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE; United States Department of Health & Human Services; National Institutes of Health (NIH) - USA; NIH National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); European Commission
UH2DA041713 / National Institutes of Health (NIH) Science of Behavior Change Common Fund Program; United States Department of Health & Human Services; National Institutes of Health (NIH) - USA
Resource Type
Journal article
Language
English
Academic Unit
Psychological and Brain Sciences (Psychology)
Web of Science ID
WOS:000496975100001
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85074126721
Other Identifier
991019169420904721
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
InCites Highlights
Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool: