Logo image
Reliability of Performance‐based Clinical Skill Assessment of Emergency Medicine Residents
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Reliability of Performance‐based Clinical Skill Assessment of Emergency Medicine Residents

William P. Burdick, Miriam Friedman Ben‐David, Loice Swishel, John Bechel, Douglas Magee, Robert McNamara and Mark Zwanger
Academic emergency medicine, v 3(12), pp 1119-1123
Dec 1996
PMID: 8959166
url
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.1996.tb03371.xView
Published, Version of Record (VoR)Maybe Open Access (Publisher Bronze) Open

Abstract

clinical competence education electrocardiogram graduate medical education medical radiograph interpretation Resident
ABSTRACT Objective: To test the overall reliability of a performance‐based clinical skill assessment for entering emergency medicine (EM) residents. Also, to investigate the reliability of separate reporting of diagnostic and management scores for a standardized patient case, subjective scoring of patient notes, and interstation exercise scores. Methods: Thirty‐four first‐year EM residents were tested using a 10‐station standardized patient (SP) examination. Following each 10‐minute encounter, the residents completed a patient note that included differential diagnosis and management. The residents also were asked to read an ECG or chest x‐ray (CXR) associated with each case. History, physical examination, and interpersonal skills were scored by the SPs. The patient note, CXR, and ECG readings were scored by faculty emergency physicians. Intercase reliability was determined for the residents. Results: Global score reliability, Cronbach's α = 0.85. Reliabilities for the other components were: history, 0.77; physical examination, 0.83; and interpersonal skills, 0.80. Differential diagnosis and management reliabilities were 0.61 and 0.66, respectively. Subjective scoring of the patient note resulted in acceptable reliability for legibility (0.80), history completeness (0.80), and history organization (0.81). Physical examination completeness and organization reliabilities were 0.74 and 0.73. For ECG and CXR readings, α = 0.74 and 0.34, respectively. Conclusions: SPs can be used to reliably assess bedside clinical skills of EM residents. While component reliability levels are slightly lower than the global clinical skill reliability coefficient, they are still high enough to use for identification of individual strengths and weaknesses.

Metrics

8 Record Views
14 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#4 Quality Education

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Emergency Medicine
Logo image