Journal article
Remote Patient Monitoring for Hypertension: Feasibility and Outcomes of a Clinic-Based Pilot in a Minority Population
JOURNAL OF PRIMARY CARE AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, v 14, 21501319231204600
2023
PMID: 37815085
Abstract
Background: In the US 48% of adults have hypertension, with direct costs in excess of $130 billion per year. Remote patient monitoring (RPM) has been discussed as a useful tool in the treatment of hypertension, but few studies evaluate its cost effectiveness or efficacy in minority, lower socio-economic (SES) populations. Our study aims to evaluate the clinical and financial outcomes of RPM in hypertension management in a primarily minority, low-SES population.Methods: In this prospective cohort pilot study, patients with uncontrolled primary hypertension (defined via Joint National Committee 8 guidelines) were randomly selected from a single academically affiliated primary care clinic. Patients were enrolled on a rolling basis for 90 days. Patients were given blood pressure cuffs and transmission hubs and asked to transmit daily blood pressure readings. Patients were called weekly by research assistants and concerns were escalated to the primary care physician. The control group was the remaining 299 uncontrolled hypertensive patients from the same clinic population analyzed via retrospective chart records at the conclusion of the interventional study period. The primary outcome was blood pressure control. Secondary outcomes were relative improvement in systolic pressure and direct costs.Results: A total of 13 patients were enrolled into the RPM intervention; these patients were 54% female, 100% African American, and 77% Medicaid. When assessed via intention-to-treat analysis, patients in the intervention group had non-inferior blood pressure control at 90 days (46% experimental vs 31% control, P = .33) and average change in systolic blood pressure at 90 days (13.5 vs 3.7 mmHg, P = .174) while experiencing a significant reduction in office-based visits at 90 days (1.5 vs 5.9, P < .001) as compared to control. Results on per-protocol analysis also showed non-inferior BP control (63% vs 31%, P = .135). Financially, the program generated margins of $29 per patient at 90 days.Conclusions: Patients in our minority- and Medicaid-predominant cohort achieved noninferior blood pressure control as compared to retrospective control at 90 days and a significant reduction in all-cause clinic visits at 90 days. The program generated little revenue per patient, with main barriers to implementation including patient compliance and payor denial.
Metrics
Details
- Title
- Remote Patient Monitoring for Hypertension: Feasibility and Outcomes of a Clinic-Based Pilot in a Minority Population
- Publication Details
- JOURNAL OF PRIMARY CARE AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, v 14, 21501319231204600
- Publisher
- SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC; THOUSAND OAKS
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Language
- English
- Academic Unit
- Drexel University
- Web of Science ID
- WOS:001083569900001
- Scopus ID
- 2-s2.0-85173670010
- Other Identifier
- 991021861197904721
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
