Journal article
Restrained Eating and Dieting: Replication of their Divergent Effects on Eating Regulation
Appetite, v 25(2)
1995
PMID: 8561483
Featured in Collection : UN Sustainable Development Goals @ Drexel
Abstract
This study examined the replicability of findings reported by Lowe, Whitlow and Bellwoar (1991) concerning eating regulation among restrained eaters and dieters. Lowe
et al. found that current dieters ate more than restrained non-dieters when not preloaded, and sharply reduced their intake following a high-calorie preload. The present study re-examined these findings and also determined the effect on intake of a high-calorie preload described as low in calories. The results replicated those reported by Lowe
et al., with non-preloaded dieters showing increased eating and preloaded dieters showing reduced eating. In the “low-calorie” condition, current dieters ate an intermediate amount. These findings bolster recent arguments (Lowe, 1993) that restraint and dieting are different phenomena which have divergent effects on eating behavior.
Metrics
Details
- Title
- Restrained Eating and Dieting: Replication of their Divergent Effects on Eating Regulation
- Creators
- MICHAEL R LOWE - Medical College of Pennsylvania and Hahnemann University
- Publication Details
- Appetite, v 25(2)
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Language
- English
- Academic Unit
- Psychological and Brain Sciences (Psychology)
- Web of Science ID
- WOS:A1995RZ66600002
- Scopus ID
- 2-s2.0-0028805407
- Other Identifier
- 991014878581904721
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
InCites Highlights
Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:
- Web of Science research areas
- Behavioral Sciences
- Nutrition & Dietetics