Logo image
Rethinking cumulative exposure in epidemiology, again
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Rethinking cumulative exposure in epidemiology, again

Frank de Vocht, Igor Burstyn and Nuthchyawach Sanguanchaiyakrit
Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, v 25(5), pp 467-473
Sep 2015
PMID: 25138292
url
https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2014.58View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)Maybe Open Access (Publisher Bronze) Open

Abstract

Dust - analysis Humans Occupational Diseases - etiology Risk Factors Thailand - epidemiology Environmental Monitoring - methods Occupational Exposure - analysis Epidemiologic Methods Computer Simulation Gloves, Protective Asthma, Occupational - etiology Surveys and Questionnaires Respiratory Function Tests Occupational Diseases - epidemiology Rubber Latex - adverse effects
The use of cumulative exposure, the product of intensity and duration, has enjoyed great popularity in epidemiology of chronic diseases despite numerous known caveats in its interpretation. We briefly review the history of use of cumulative exposure in epidemiology and propose an alternative method for relating time-integrated exposures to health risks. We argue, as others before us have, that cumulative exposure metrics obscures the interplay of exposure intensity and duration. We propose to use a computationally simple alternative in which duration and intensity of exposure are modelled as a main effect and their interaction, cumulative exposure, only be added if there is evidence of deviation from this additive model. We also consider the Lubin-Caporaso model of interplay of exposure intensity and duration. The impact of measurement error in intensity on model selection was also examined. The value of this conceptualization is demonstrated using a simulation study and further illustrated in the context of respiratory health and occupational exposure to latex dust. We demonstrate why cumulative exposure has been so popular because the cumulative exposure metric per se gives a robust answer to the existence of an association, regardless of the underlying true mechanism of disease. Treating cumulative exposure as the interaction of main effects of exposure duration and intensity enables epidemiologists to derive more information about mechanism of disease then fitting cumulative exposure metric by itself, and without the need to collect additional data. We propose that the practice of fitting duration, intensity and cumulative exposure separately to epidemiologic data should lead to conceptualization of cumulative exposure as interaction of main effects of duration and intensity of exposure.

Metrics

13 Record Views
40 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Environmental Sciences
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
Toxicology
Logo image