Logo image
Retraction of Predatory publishing in Scopus : evidence on cross-country differences lacks justification
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Retraction of Predatory publishing in Scopus : evidence on cross-country differences lacks justification

Giovanni Abramo, Isidro F. Aguillo, Dag W. Aksnes, Kevin Boyack, Quentin L. Burrell, Juan Miguel Campanario, Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Rodrigo Costas, Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo, Anne Wil Harzing, …
Scientometrics, v 128(2), pp 1459-1461
01 Feb 2023
url
https://hdl.handle.net/1887/3515411View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)Open Access (License Unspecified) Open

Abstract

Biblioteks-och informationsvetenskap Information Studies Media and Communications Medie- och kommunikationsvetenskap Samhällsvetenskap Social Sciences
As members of the Distinguished Reviewers Board of Scientometrics and/or as recipients of the Derek de Solla Price Medal, we wish to express our disagreement with the retraction of the paper “Predatory publishing in Scopus: evidence on cross-country differences” co-authored by Vít Macháček and Martin Srholec (Macháček & Srholec, 2021a). The retraction was discussed in the blog Retraction Watch (Oransky, 2021), where important information about the context of the retraction was disclosed, including the pressure exerted by the publisher Frontiers on Scientometrics.

Metrics

12 Record Views
7 citations in Scopus

Details

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications
Information Science & Library Science
Logo image