Logo image
Rewriting the Record: A Qualitative Analysis of Race, Criminal History, and Sentencing Policy Reform in Pennsylvania
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Rewriting the Record: A Qualitative Analysis of Race, Criminal History, and Sentencing Policy Reform in Pennsylvania

C. Clare Strange, Rhys Hester, Jeffrey T. Ulmer and Lourdes Moore
Race and justice, v 16(1), pp 191-213
01 Jan 2026
url
https://doi.org/10.1177/21533687251360736View
Published, Version of Record (VoR) Restricted

Abstract

Criminology & Penology Ethnic Studies Social Sciences
Research on courts and sentencing shows an inextricable link between race and criminal history, which is often cited as a key driver of disparities in outcomes. Despite robust academic evidence of the detrimental effects of prior record policies, sentencing commissions and policymakers generally have demonstrated no interest in making changes to sentencing policies to address the disparities that flow from prior record penalty enhancements. One notable exception is the Pennsylvania Commission on Sentencing whose eighth edition guidelines drastically restructured that system's prior record score (PRS) to reduce the impact of criminal history on punishment recommendations. Rooted in Du Bois's sociological criminology perspective, the current study employs a qualitative analysis of ten years of documentation (2013-2023) to investigate the motivations, challenges, and ultimate achievements of this significant punishment policy reform. Sources of documentation include internal and publicly available reports, presentations, and transcripts from over 50 hours of recorded Commission meetings and public hearings. Findings reveal a lengthy, thoughtful, and at times, challenging journey from initial proposals to the adopted version of PRS. The results have strong implications for policymaking in jurisdictions reconsidering the role of criminal history in punishment and looking to reduce racial and ethnic disparities.

Metrics

8 Record Views

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being
#16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Criminology & Penology
Ethnic Studies
Logo image