Logo image
Romantic partner undermining in a behavioral weight loss intervention
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Romantic partner undermining in a behavioral weight loss intervention

Marny Michelle Ehmann, Nicole T. Crane, Reena S Chabria, Danielle R Arigo and Meghan L Butryn
Journal of behavioral medicine, v 48, pp 813-822
08 Aug 2025
PMID: 40779060
Featured in Collection :   Research Supported by Drexel Libraries' OA Programs
url
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-025-00597-4View
Published, Version of Record (VoR) Open Access via Drexel Libraries Read and Publish Program 2025 Open CC BY V4.0

Abstract

Social influences Social undermining Behavioral weight loss Obesity
Romantic partner undermining is a type of negative social influence that has the potential to make weight loss more challenging and consists of two components: (1) undermining behaviors, or overt romantic partner behaviors including criticism/complaint of weight control or interference behaviors (e.g., offering up high calorie foods), and (2) undermining attitudes, including negative beliefs that a romantic partner has about their significant other’s weight loss attempts. The present study was the first to the authors’ knowledge to investigate romantic partner undermining attitudes and behaviors reported by participants enrolled in in a behavioral weight loss (BWL) intervention, a first line treatment for weight loss. The study also examined whether partner undermining attitudes and behaviors differed by relationship quality and between those who did and did not choose their romantic partner to serve in a support role in the intervention. Participants (N = 128) enrolled in a group-based BWL intervention reported on perceived romantic partner undermining attitudes and behaviors at baseline and 3 months (end of the intensive period of BWL intervention). Results showed that participants perceived minimal romantic partner undermining at baseline (attitudes M = 2.2 ± 0.7, behaviors M = 2.3 ± 1.2) and 3 months (attitudes M = 2.0 ± 0.6, behaviors M = 1.9 ± 1.1). However, participants reported a significant reduction in total undermining attitudes (M change = − 0.2 points) and behaviors (M change = − 0.4 points) from baseline to 3 months (ps <.05), highlighting the potential of group-based BWL interventions to mitigate romantic partner undermining without explicit content focused on undermining. Future research should examine romantic partner undermining across time in varying weight control and relationship conditions and measure undermining at the daily or weekly level to reduce recall bias and improve ecological validity.

Metrics

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being
#5 Gender Equality

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Psychology, Clinical
Logo image