Logo image
Back
Scanning the aged to minimize missed injury: An EAST multicenter study
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Scanning the aged to minimize missed injury: An EAST multicenter study

Vanessa P. Ho, Sami K. Kishawi, Hannah Hill, Joseph O’Brien, Asanthi Ratnasekera, Sirivan Suon Seng, Trieu Hai Ton, Christopher A. Butts, Alison Muller, Bernardo Fabian Diaz, …
The journal of trauma and acute care surgery
27 May 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004390
PMID: 38797882
url
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11599468/pdf/nihms-2013337.pdfView
Open

Abstract

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Despite the high incidence of blunt trauma in older adults, there is a lack of evidence-based guidance for computed tomography (CT) imaging in this population. We aimed to identify an algorithm to guide use of a Pan-Scan (Head/C-spine/Torso) or a Selective Scan (Head/C-spine ± Torso). We hypothesized that a patient’s initial history and exam could be used to guide imaging. METHODS We prospectively studied blunt trauma patients aged 65+ at 18 Level I/II trauma centers. Patients presenting >24 h after injury or who died upon arrival were excluded. We collected history and physical elements and final injury diagnoses. Injury diagnoses were categorized into CT body regions of Head/C-spine or Torso (chest, abdomen/pelvis, and T/L spine). Using machine learning and regression modeling as well as a priori clinical algorithms based, we tested various decision rules against our dataset. Our priority was to identify a simple rule which could be applied at the bedside, maximizing sensitivity (Sens) and negative predictive value (NPV) to minimize missed injuries. RESULTS We enrolled 5,498 patients with 3,082 injuries. Nearly half (47.1%, n = 2,587) had an injury within the defined CT body regions. No rule to guide a Pan-Scan could be identified with suitable Sens/NPV for clinical use. A clinical algorithm to identify patients for Pan-Scan, using a combination of physical exam findings and specific high-risk criteria, was identified and had a Sens of 0.94 and NPV of 0.86 This rule would have identified injuries in all but 90 patients (1.6%) and would theoretically spare 11.9% (655) of blunt trauma patients a torso CT. CONCLUSIONS Our findings advocate for Head/Cspine CT in all geriatric patients with the addition of torso CT in the setting of positive clinical findings and high-risk criteria. Prospective validation of this rule could lead to streamlined diagnostic care of this growing trauma population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level 2, Diagnostic Tests or Criteria

Metrics

9 Record Views
3 citations in Scopus

Details

Logo image