Logo image
Self-Perceived Likelihood of False Confession: A Comparison of Justice-Involved Juveniles and Adults
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Self-Perceived Likelihood of False Confession: A Comparison of Justice-Involved Juveniles and Adults

Emily Haney-Caron, Naomi E. S. Goldstein and Constance Mesiarik
Criminal justice and behavior, v 45(12), pp 1955-1976
Dec 2018

Abstract

False confessions represent a significant problem for the criminal and juvenile justice systems and juveniles may be at particular risk for falsely confessing. In part, this risk may be due to juveniles’ greater likelihood of waiving Miranda rights and, consequently, undergoing interrogation, as well as their heightened suggestibility and greater susceptibility to and compliance with authority figures compared to adults. With data from 260 participants in correctional facilities, this study compared juveniles’ ( n = 168) and adults’ ( n = 92) self-reported likelihood of false confessions. Younger juveniles reported significantly greater false confession propensity than did adults, especially in response to directive interrogation techniques. Older juveniles did not differ significantly from adults in their self-reported likelihood of false confession. Miranda rights comprehension mediated the relationship between age and false confession likelihood. These findings suggest the need for greater protections of younger juveniles during interrogations.

Metrics

53 Record Views
16 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Criminology & Penology
Psychology, Clinical
Logo image