Journal article
Sibling Comparisons to Account for Confounding in Observational Studies
JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association, v 335(7), pp 626-627
17 Feb 2026
PMID: 41499111
Featured in Collection : UN Sustainable Development Goals @ Drexel
Abstract
This JAMA Guide to Statistics and Methods explains how sibling analysis can be used to account for confounding in observational studies, using the example of a study on acid suppressants during pregnancy and risk of neuropsychiatric disorders in offspring.
Metrics
7 Record Views
Details
- Title
- Sibling Comparisons to Account for Confounding in Observational Studies
- Creators
- Viktor H. Ahlqvist - Karolinska InstitutetBrian K. Lee - Drexel University, Epidemiology and BiostatisticsYu-Han Chiu - Brown University
- Publication Details
- JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association, v 335(7), pp 626-627
- Publisher
- Amer Medical Assoc
- Number of pages
- 2
- Grant note
- PG-24-0427 / Swedish Society for Medical Research R35GM154888 / NIH; United States Department of Health & Human Services; National Institutes of Health (NIH) - USA
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Language
- English
- Academic Unit
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics
- Web of Science ID
- WOS:001657293400001
- Scopus ID
- 2-s2.0-105027343759
- Other Identifier
- 991022152137804721
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
InCites Highlights
Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:
- Collaboration types
- Domestic collaboration
- International collaboration
- Web of Science research areas
- Public, Environmental & Occupational Health