Logo image
Status of faculty affairs and faculty development offices in U.S. medical schools
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Status of faculty affairs and faculty development offices in U.S. medical schools

Page S Morahan, Jennifer S Gold and Janet Bickel
Academic medicine, v 77(5), pp 398-401
01 May 2002
PMID: 12010695
url
https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200205000-00009View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)Maybe Open Access (Publisher Bronze) Open

Abstract

Abridged Index Medicus
PURPOSETo collect baseline data and describe how medical schools handle faculty affairs and faculty development responsibilities. METHODIn January 2000, the authors surveyed faculty affairs designees at 125 U.S. medical schools, using a questionnaire developed in consultation with a group of faculty affairs professionals. RESULTSThe responding 76 medical schools (61%) support over four times as many offices of faculty affairs as faculty development offices. Core functions of faculty affairs offices include administrative support for appointments, promotions, and tenure committees; faculty information and policies; faculty governance processes; and department chairs' recruitment support and personnel management issues. CONCLUSIONWhile a consensus is emerging about the functions of a faculty affairs office, no school has a comprehensive faculty development system, in contrast to most industries, which must be more forward-looking to compete for talent.

Metrics

7 Record Views
22 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#4 Quality Education

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Education, Scientific Disciplines
Health Care Sciences & Services
Logo image